Background and Purpose

The X0110 State Total Section 61a(1) Funding Report is generated based on 4483 enrollment data reported in the Career Technical Education Information System (CTEIS). It reflects State total student enrollment and funding data by CIP Code, and is arranged in State Rank order.

The purpose of this document is to describe each heading, row, and column, reflected on the X0110 State Total Section 61a(1) Funding Report, and to provide an explanation of the information contained in this report.

Location of Report: Login to: www.cteis.com. From the Menu, select Reports and then select Funding Reports. To select a previous year report, please select year from right side panel. For public reports: reports.cteis.com, no login required.

What Do I Need to Know About the Distribution of Section 61a1 (Added Cost) Funds?
● There are insufficient Section 61a1 funds available to reimburse all CTE programs.
● Therefore, a priority established for distribution of Added Cost based on a 60/40% split (60% state determination/40% local determination)
● 60% of the Section 61a1 funds are distributed to the top 20 CIP Codes based on the State Rank List
● The State Rank List is determined by OCTE based on the following 3 factors:

Job Openings (x2)
Placement
Wages

● 40% of the Section 61a1 funds are distributed based on individual programs (PSNs) selected by each CEPD Administrator, and submitted via CEPD Options.

X0110 - State Summary
Column Headings	Explanation of Columns
Header (Upper-Left corner)	State Total Section 61a1 Added Cost Funds – reflects the total Section 61a1 funds allocated for a given year. 60% of Section 61a1 Funds – reflects the dollar amount represented by 60% of the total Section 61a1 allocation for a given year. These funds are only generated by the top 20 CIP Codes on the State Rank List. 40% of Section 61a1 Funds – reflects the dollar amount represented by 40% of the total Section 61a1 allocation for a given year. These funds are generated based upon CEPD Option Selection. Only programs identified by the Career Education Planning Districts (CEPDs), submitted via the CEPD Options Report, will generate these funds.
CIP Code	Classification of Instructional Program code – a 6-digit code assigned to each CTE program. This report lists all programs in State Rank Order.
Program Name	The state-assigned program name of each CIP Code.
Rank (1)	Rank Factor (1, 2.5, 5, 10) - this column reflects the rank factor (R) for each program, which is used in the formula to generate Section 61a1 funds. Only the top 20 programs on the State Rank List will receive a rank factor value greater than 1. Of the top 20 ranked programs, the top 7 programs have a rank factor of 10; the next 7 programs have a rank factor of 5; and the next 6 programs have a rank factor of 2.5. (All programs that fall below the top 20, have a rank factor of 1.)
Cost (2)	Cost Factor (1, 5, 10) - this column reflects the cost factor (M) for each program, which is used in the formula to generate Section 61a1 funds. These cost factors are based on a 3-year average of the total expenditures per student, reported for each CIP Code – ranked from most expensive to least expensive. The top third of the programs (most expensive) have a cost factor of 10; the next third of the programs have a cost factor of 5; and the bottom third of the programs have a cost factor of 1.
Student Advancement	The total student Enrollees, Participants, Concentrators, and Concentrators+ reflected under this heading are used in the formula to generate Section 61a(1) funds. The student numbers reflected in these four columns are unduplicated at the PSN level. (In other words, each student is only counted once per year for each program in which they were enrolled – as either a program enrollee, participant, concentrator, or concentrator+.) The progress of each student is determined at the end of the school year, based on the total number of segments or PCCs (Perkins Course Competencies) successfully completed in each program.
Enr (3)	Enrollees- this column reflects the total number of students who completed less than 4 segments (or less than 1 PCC) of the program. Enrollees (E) are weighted .5 in the Section 61a(1) funding formula.
Part (4)	Participants – this column reflects the total number of students who successfully completed less than 4 segments (or less than 1 of a program. Participants (E) are weighted 1 in the Section 61a1 funding formula.
Conc (5)	Concentrators – this column reflects the total number of students who successfully completed 8-11 segments (or 2 PCCs) of the program (with a grade of 2.0 or better), Concentrators (N) are weighted 5 in the Section 61a1 funding formula.
Conc+ (6)	Concentrators + – this column reflects the total number of students who are more than concentrators. Concentrators+ (C) are weighted 10 in the Section 61a1 funding formula. Following are the ways in which students may qualify as a concentrator+. For students enrolled in CIP Codes reporting by Segments: Students who successfully complete 12 Segments of the program (with a grade of 2.0 or better). Students who successfully complete 8 segments of the program (with a grade of 2.0 or better), plus earned an OCTE-approved credential (reported in CTEIS by the June Enrollment Report submission deadline). For students enrolled in CIP Codes reporting by Competencies Students who successfully complete 3 or more PCCs of the program (with a grade of 2.0 or better). Students who successfully complete 2 PCCs of the program (with a grade of 2.0 or better), plus earned an OCTE-approved credential (reported in CTEIS by the June Enrollment Report submission deadline).
State 60% PFV (7)	State Total 60% Program Formula Values (PFV) - this column reflects the State total results of the following formula - calcuated for each CIP Code that is in the top 20 CIP Codes on the State Rank List. Formula: [(E.5) + (P1) + (N5) + (C10)] * M * R = State Total 60% Program Formula Value (PFV) Explanation: [(Enrollees x .5) + (Participants x 1) + (Concentrators x 5) + (Concentrators+ x 10)] x Cost Factor x Rank Factor = State Total 60% Program Formula Value (PFV) In order to calculate the amount of 60% Section 61a1 funds each program (PSN) will generate, the Program Formula Value (for each PSN) in this column, is divided by the State Total 60% Program Formula Value to produce a fraction. (the CIP Code's percentage of the State Total PFV). This fraction is then multiplied by the total dollar amount represented by 60% of the Section 61a(1) funds allocated (displayed in upper left corner of this report) to calculate the State total dollar amount for each CIP Code.
60% Funds (8)	60% Section 61a(1) Funds – this column reflects the state total amount of 60% funds generated by each (CIP Code) that is in the top 20 CIP Codes on the State Rank List.
40% PFV (9)	40% Program Formula Values (PFV) – this column reflects the state total results of the following formula - calculated for each CIP Code that was selected by one or more CEPDs to generate 40% funds. Formula: [(E.5) + (P1) + (N5) + (C10)] * M = State Total 40% Program Formula Value (PFV) Explanation: [(Enrollees x .5) + (Participants x 1) + (Concentrators x 5) + (Concentrators+ x 10)] x Cost Factor = State Total 40% Program Formula Value (PFV) Note: The 40% formula values are calculated by individual CEPD. Therefore, this column of total formula values by CIP Code cannot be used to calculate 40% funds. It is simply a sum (by CIP Code) of the formula values that were derived at the CEPD level.
40% Funds (10)	40% Section 61a1 Funds – this column reflects the state total amount of 40% funds generated by each CIP Code selected by one or more CEPDs.
Total (11)	Total Section 61a1 Funds this column reflects the state total Section 61a1 funds (60% Funds +40% Funds) generated by each CIP Code.